Thursday, May 31, 2012

ACTIVISTS CHANGING THEIR STORY INTO ANOTHER LIE

I think we have all heard the outrageous lie by the activists of the frostbite at Devore. Well, they were challenged to present proof of this frostbite and they have yet to answer that challenged.


Now they are claiming it was a chemical burn. Wait a minute here. Did no one take this dog to the vet? Were there no tests run to determine the prognosis of either frostbite or chemical burns? What's the deal here?
Lori Wagner

I'm not sure who started this page but the pic you've depicted is more than likely not of frostbite injuries but of 'chemical burns.' It's ONE of the things management at Devore can deny because the frostbite apparently NEVER happened - however, the CHEMICAL BURNS, did occur and several dogs were severely injured from it. Unfortunately, those in rescue who took some of the chemically burned dogs/pups did not and will not come forward. THIS is the key reason that Devore continues to go on with their cruel practices and get away with them. THOSE who have witnessed incidents and have proof - real 'legal' evidence - need to come forward for change to happen at Devore. Otherwise, Devore management just chalks it up to more hysteria by the 'humane-iacs' - their word, not mine.

Now I ask you, why aren't these rescuers coming forward? Why are the activists begging them to give some evidence? Could it be that the activists have absolutely no evidence to back up their accusations? Note the writer refers to "real "legal" evidence. What does that say? It says they have no evidence, just their unfounded accusations that are pushing the public away and causing more animals to die. Then again, that is their true motive for doing all this, make more die so they can yell and scream "No Kill". Hidden agendas abound with these activists. 

Saturday, May 26, 2012

DERRY GRASPING AT STRAWS. HE DOESN'T HAVE MUCH ELSE TO HANG HIS HAT ON.

I really think that Derry is losing it. He calls constituents "liars", he jumps into bed with radical animal rights activists, gun toting mamas blogged about previously here.


Now he thinks he will win the election by making people think he is a nice guy because he cares about animals. BULL. There is no pet vote, Derry. And you've done so much damage while in office, there's no saving you at this point.


Here's the recent piece of Derry's propaganda. I am putting it up so you can see that Derry is taking credit for establishing a non-existent commission. The commission PRESENTATION has been put off to a later date. Is this a big, fat lie from Derry? 



Preventing Animal Abuse (What the hell? There's been no proof presented about abuse at Devore, only unfounded accusations, Derry.)


Responding to the concerns of local residents (What local residents? A mere handful, the rest were from other places, not from San Bernardino,some who have never been inside Devore), Neil created (When did this happen? No record of this happening, Derry) a new Citizens Animal Services Commission to monitor conditions at animal shelters and prevent abuse.(Again, where is the proof? After all the investigations, all the efforts by these radical animal rights activists, nothing has come out indicating abuse at Devore.)


WHEN YOU SAY THINGS LIKE THIS, DERRY, YOU BECOME PART OF THE PROBLEM AND YOU PUSH THE PUBLIC AWAY FROM THE SHELTERS. IN ESSENCE, YOU NOW HAVE BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS JUST LIKE THE ACTIVISTS DO.


ALL I CAN SAY AT THIS POINT IS, VOTE FOR JAMES RAMOS, GET THIS SUCKER OUT OF OFFICE BEFORE HE DOES SOME REAL HARM.

Thursday, May 17, 2012

AN ATTEMPT BY ACTIVISTS TO "DIVIDE AND CONQUER" THE BOS

That's the question. I was sent this email that had been sent by the infamous Sharon Gilbert to some other parties. She needs to review her friends I think.


> From: Sharon Gilbert
> Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 5:45 PM
> To: 
> Cc
> Subject: Re: Fw: San Bernardino County Sun: About 20 protesters converge on Devore Ani...
>  
> PLEASE do NOT post this to Facebook or any social media.  I just received a call from Brad Mitzelfelt's campaign manager who is a close personal friend.  I had mentioned to him that Brad is losing votes over the Dogs Day Inn issue and what was said by some high desert rescues at the protest Saturday.  I was just told that if we can provide information on what is going on there, they will open a case on it and investigate.  Despite his campaign manager and I being close personal friends, Brad and I are bitter enemies so I cannot do this.  I need people who are willing to come forward with personal knowledge of the situation.  I know at least one rescue has been banned for posting the photo of the puppies being hosed down in the dead of winter on Facebook.  there was the incident of the animal control officer throwing the dogs against the side of the truck but I don't think that rescuer will come forward by herself because of retaliation.  There is also the issue of the fact that there is no signage whatsoever showing that it is a county shelter.
>
> If anyone knows someone credible who is not afraid to come forward, please send them my way.  The election is June 5.  I hate to be so blunt but we probably have a very narrow window of opportunity.
>
> Please do not forward this email.



Considering the circumstances, I would advise Mitzelfelt to steer clear of this situation and put some distance between himself and Derry. Either that or get a new campaign manager. Sharon is attempting to use outside influence to divide and conquer.


This is an email sent earlier.




From: Sharon Gilbert <iepolitics2010@gmail.com>
To:
Cc:
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2012 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: San Bernardino County Sun: About 20 protesters converge on Devore Ani...

Yes, the best we can hope for is a runoff between Josie and one of her opponents.  Josie has about a million dollars in her war chest.  The others don't have any money.  John did pay for a ballot statement which will garner quite a few more votes than normal.  The other opponent is also a Hispanic female but no ballot statement.  The county deems declined to endorse Josie as did Congressman Baca.  Her hometown dem party endorsed her opponent.  John will pull all the republican votes and we can only hope the opponent can pull enough dem votes to force a runoff.  That will mean she needs to be on good behavior until November, which will give us some breathing room.  Also just maybe the FBI will make an arrest or two in the two scandals she is caught up in.  She is a suspect in at least one of them.

Mitzelfelt is Neils only ally on the BOS.  He is a lame duck as he is running for Congress.  He and Neil usually vote together against the other three.  Brad's office is offering us a sit-down with us on this but it can't be done without volunteers.  I do know they are investigating another animal control officer complaint, but if found true, I doubt it will get that officer more than a letter of reprimand.  I can only hope it is the same officer that was throwing the dogs against the truck.

Of the seven that are running to replace brad, I don't believe there is an animal lover among them.  So even if Neil wins, he will likely be all by himself.  That is why time is of the essence.  The county administrative office does not want this commission to be formed.  

Again, I would advise Mitzelfelt to distance himself. Although he is a lame duck, he is running for another office. These activists are a ball and chain at this point for any politician. 

GUN TOTING MAMA ACTIVIST HAS MADE THE NEWS!!

Guess it is a small world. This was just published and the actions speak louder than the words.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/animal-rights/animal-rights-activist-eileen-smulson-poses-gun-facebook-targets-shelter
“Operation Blankets of Love” website tells us it “is an award-winning non-profit 501(c)3 public charity” and that Eileen Smulson founded the organization because, “I wanted to make sure every homeless pet had warmth and comfort by having a blanket to snuggle in while they were waiting to be adopted into a loving forever home.”
Most postings by animal rescuers and activists are slathered with phrases like, “saving precious lives,” “finding forever homes” and “speaking for the voiceless,” so immediately the image of the animal-rights’ equivalent of Mother Teresa pops into mind.
Boy, were we wrong! Looks like the “arms” that comfort distressed shelter animals have changed dramatically.


That's one of the problems these days is the misconception that when someone says they rescue animals, immediately people think that they are the salt of the earth. Nothing could be further from the truth. Fact is that humane work attracts a lot of warped minds, egos, abusers, etc. Actions speak much louder than words and the actions of these activists speaks loads that they aren't doing this to save lives, their actions are taking lives.
Without naming those who may be Eileen’s targets, I learned from shelter staff and her own YouTube video that the founder of Operation Blankets of Love is upset that the shelter cannot promise blankets she wants to provide will be used throughout this municipal shelter’s kennel.

While the image of animals curled up on soft blankies is appealing, the reality is that they are often ripped into shreds and ingested by the animals. Blankets are also often the cause of violent fights in which dogs are seriously injured. The Devore shelter, I’m told, also uses a septic pump which can become clogged by pieces of the blankets, causing the animal waste to back up into the kennels.
Denial of emergency room visits from dogs eating blankets only means dogs dying a painful death. Devore isn't staffed 24 hours a day. Those blankets are to stroke the ego of this Smulson, that's all. 
The official statistics show that 8 of the 12 shelters serving this county euthanize MORE than the Devore shelter. So, why is Devore being targeted?
That's the question I want answered too, WHY DEVORE?

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

MORE FROM THE WARPED MINDS OF THE DEVORE TERRORISTS


Now this is really sick. Why not a bumper sticker asking people to save the pets at Devore? Again these terrorists aren't interested in helping the Devore shelter pets, their actions speak much louder than their words. Warped minds like this. 



Tuesday, May 15, 2012

THE ACTIVISTS ARE RESORTING TO TERRORIST THREATS

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150832708578624&set=o.152290111503479&type=1&theater

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Stop-Devore-Animal-Cruelty/152290111503479?filter=2


Description: http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-ash2/157768_712608623_2062142149_q.jpg
May 5

Operation Blankets of Love has animal abusers and cruel shelter workers in sight!!
We're not going to take it!! No, we're not going to take it! We're not going to take it anymore!!!
www.operationblanketsoflove.org
·          
·         Stop Devore Animal Cruelty likes this.

This terrorist threat has been sent to the BOS, to the Sheriff, and to the FBI Animal Terrorism task force. Maybe these activists think this funny, but it is not and is being treated as a threat. 

Monday, May 14, 2012

SPEAKING OF PIT BULLS, MORE AND MORE ARE GETTING ON THE BANDWAGON TO REGULATE PITS

We all know that "No Kill" does a radio show. Well now there is another kid on the block and looking good. This is a webcast on the dangers of pit bulls. 


http://pitbulldangers.net/pitbullblog/ and http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pitbulldangers
are about educating the public on the dangers of pit bulls and dangerous dogs (gripping dogs) as well as the proper solutions to prevent attacks, save lives, and prevent the permanently life altering injuries sustained in these attacks on a daily basis in the US. This is a serious and growing crisis that is reaching epidemic proportions. 


Plus a growing list of blogs, websites, and facebook pages calling for regulation of pits. 

Pages:
  1. https://www.facebook.com/banpitbullssavelives
  2. https://www.facebook.com/pitbulldangers
  3. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pit-Bull-Dangers-Blog/160936757308936
  4. https://www.facebook.com/PitBullDangersPetition
  5. https://www.facebook.com/AmericasDog
  6. https://www.facebook.com/HelpBanPitbulls
  7. https://www.facebook.com/BanPitbulls
  8. https://www.facebook.com/EradicatePitBulls
  9. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pit-Bulls-in-the-USA/240194442713340
  10. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-the-Kids-Ban-all-Pit-Bulls-out-of-family-homes/299611870049719
  11. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rachael-Rays-Pitbull-Attacks/167983486608040
  12. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pitbulls-Family-Mauling-Tree/292507977435035
  13. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pitbulls-from-Australia/265776790101902
  14. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-the-Kids-Ban-all-Pit-Bulls-out-of-family-homes/299611870049719
  15. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-and-Restrict-Pit-Bulls-Across-the-Country/313759235306590
  16. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pit-bull-Dogs-from-Public-Housing/218756441479873
  17. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pitbull-Dogs-in-Tucson/285948471427570
  18. https://www.facebook.com/dogsbite.org
  19. https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-hate-pitbull-owners/248525878513035
  20. https://www.facebook.com/pages/BAN-PIT-BULLS/260880520610570
  21. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Please-pass-ban-on-pit-bulls-in-Columbus/100466106664090
  22. https://www.facebook.com/groups/137548636282402/
  23. https://www.facebook.com/NoKillNationNoSpinZone
  24. Boycott Pepsi https://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Pepsi/306579219418353
  25. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Please-pass-ban-on-pit-bulls-in-Columbus/100466106664090
  26. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pitbull-Dogs-in-Tucson/285948471427570
  27. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pitbulls-from-Australia/265776790101902
  28. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-the-Kids-Ban-all-Pit-Bulls-out-of-family-homes/299611870049719
  29. https://www.facebook.com/AmericasDog
  30. https://www.facebook.com/HelpBanPitbulls
  31. https://www.facebook.com/BanPitbulls
  32. https://www.facebook.com/EradicatePitBulls
  33. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pit-Bulls-in-the-USA/240194442713340
  34. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Rachael-Rays-Pitbull-Attacks/167983486608040
  35. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Pitbulls-Family-Mauling-Tree/292507977435035
  36. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Save-the-Kids-Ban-all-Pit-Bulls-out-of-family-homes/299611870049719
  37. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-and-Restrict-Pit-Bulls-Across-the-Country/313759235306590
  38. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pit-bull-Dogs-from-Public-Housing/218756441479873
  39. https://www.facebook.com/pages/I-hate-pitbull-owners/248525878513035
  40. https://www.facebook.com/pages/BAN-PIT-BULLS/260880520610570
  41. https://www.facebook.com/groups/137548636282402/
  42. https://www.facebook.com/PitbullBan

Blogs:
  1. Americ's Dog http://americasdog.blogspot.com/
  2. Pit Bull Dangers http://pitbulldangers.net/pitbullblog
  3. The Pit Bull Nation Blog http://thepitbullnation.tumblr.com
  4. http://www.dogsbitedecatural.com/
  5. http://fourleggedfriendsandenemies.blogspot.com/
  6. http://educatingpeopleaboutpitbulls.blogspot.com/


Groups:
  1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/thepitbullproblem/336667606386336
  2. https://www.facebook.com/groups/21244393629/
  3. https://www.facebook.com/pages/Ban-Pitbull-Dogs-in-Tucson/285948471427570
  4. https://www.facebook.com/groups/300945706619591/
  5. https://www.facebook.com/groups/19990253985/
  6. https://www.facebook.com/groups/135758849877793/


Communities:
  1. Pit Bull Dangers http://pitbulldangers.com


And these silly activists think there is only one person in this fight.


VICTIM OF A PIT BULL ATTACK BLAMES RESCUES FOR NOT DOING THEIR JOB

I posted about the Maryland Court case that will be breaking the back of "No Kill". Already Maryland shelters are refusing to adopt out pits. This case came about because of a vicious attack on Dominic Solesky by a pit bull. 


Dominic's father sees the problem and he is talking about it.  

Unfortunately, too many in the "humane" business have failed to turn their attention on the real problem that allows the proliferation of ill-bred pit bulls, many of which end up being maulers: unrestrained pit bull breeders. High courts recognize that human victims of these injurious maulings must have a way to be compensated after a brutal attack. 

The dismal failure of "humane" and rescue groups -- both of which have had over 25 years to find a solution to the pit bull problem -- is now going to be exacerbated (more unwanted pit bulls winding up in shelters) due to this ruling. You have your own mismanagement of 25+ years to blame. Finally, due to "humane" groups failing to be honest about this breed's inherent danger, high courts have made this declaration themselves.

And I agree, these "Savior" rescues, as I call them, have ignored the damages being done by their "save them all". Closed casket funerals are a legacy of these rescues. Many pits have mauled and attacked who were adopted out by a "Savior" group. These people don't care about the beloved pets mauled and killed by pits, yet they claim to care about animals. What animals? The ones bred to do one thing and only one thing - to kill? What about all the others?

What about the humans being mauled and killed by pits? Two thirds of the DBRFs are being done by pits. In spite of the gun for hire, Karen Delise, proclaiming her godly powers of being able to get records on attacks when the police won't even release the records to the victims, pits are killing in numbers unlike any other breeds in history. 

And these activists at Devore are a part of this group. They don't care about all the people and beloved pets being mauled and killed, they don't even care about the very animals they claim to care about. You don't walk around a shelter with hateful, political signs and expect miracles. They know what they are doing, they know their role in killing the Devore animals, and they don't care.

PROTEST WAS A BUST!!

Only about 20 people showed and probably out of those, only maybe a handful at best were actually county residents. 


Can anyone say "BUST", "JOKE", "BALONEY". However, it did mean more pets having to die because that protest caused people to turn away from the shelter. These aren't protesters, these are animal killers disguised as part of the humane community. 

Thursday, May 10, 2012

SUPERVISOR NEIL DERRY CONDONES LAWBREAKER AND CALLS DEVORE STAFF "NAZIS"

Incredible!! This is an elected official and his manner of behavior is that of a hillbilly. I saw elsewhere where he only said one word to a constituent, "Liar". You don't do that, it is rude and not acceptable from a person elected to office. Now there is this. Derry is showing himself to be totally unacceptable as a servant of the people.


This was discovered on a facebook page. 

§  
Toni Chapman Momberger i'm the proud owner of nine rescued pets. you can hardly walk through my house.
§  
Supervisor Neil Derry That is probably a code violation Toni :)
§  
Toni Momberger i am totally in violation of code.
§  Description: http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/27432_100000218913935_7390_q.jpg
Supervisor Neil Derry Don't let the animal nazis know...
§  
Toni Momberger let's just keep this between us.
§  Description: http://profile.ak.fbcdn.net/hprofile-ak-snc4/27432_100000218913935_7390_q.jpg
Supervisor Neil Derry You bet...like the boots

Desperate are you, Derry? Well, I have news for you, the pet vote will not get you re-elected. This deserves a reprimand from the Board of Supervisors. You have insulted county employees and the Jewish community. You also insult our intelligence.

Monday, May 7, 2012

"NO KILL"ACTIVISTS PLAN TO PROTEST DEVORE ANIMAL SHELTER DESPITE POSITIVE LIFESAVING EFFORTS BY DEVORE

The “No-Kill" Activists have launched yet another attack on the County’s Devore Animal Shelter.  Even though the County’s animal shelters in Devore, Big Bear Lake and Dogs Day Inn pet boarding facility in Apple Valley ranked # 4 in the County for positive live release outcomes for pets (see below chart) the “activists” have scheduled a protest at the Devore Animal Shelter.  Eight other animal shelters in San Bernardino County had higher euthanasia rates last year, but are the “activists” protesting those “High Kill” shelters?  No!  The eight other shelters “Kill” more animals by percentage than Devore and the San Bernardino City Animal Shelter killed almost twice as many animals than the County’s three shelters combined.


This is a special note to the elected officials in San Bernardino County.  No matter how hard you work to save animal lives; No matter how much money you spend to create positive outcomes for animals; the “No-Kill Activists” will still picket and protest your facilities even when you rank # 4 out of twelve shelters that serve the County.
It is obvious the “No-Kill" activists could care less about the number of animals euthanized or killed.  If they truly were concerned about high euthanasia or kill rates, they would picket a high kill shelter.  The County’s animal shelters are actually below the national average of an estimated 50% euthanasia rate and last year the County’s euthanasia rate was 45.15% for the three shelters they operate or partially manage.  It is clear the “activists” only want to see the County’s euthanasia rates increase, this is why they have selected a shelter with one of the lowest euthanasia rates in the County to picket.  Run off the adopters and discourage adoptions and you will see the euthanasia rates rise.  This is why the “activists” elected to not support the County’s participation in the ASPCA 100K Challenge.  They have also elected to not support the County’s 1st Mega Pet Adoption Event.  Not one mention of the Homeward Bound Mega Pet Adoption Event is listed on any of the “activist’s” websites.  Again, they only want to promote their propaganda and senseless agenda.


We have requested the below public records to forward this summary to all of the local media outlets.  This way the news reporters will be able to ask the critical questions, “Why are you picketing a shelter that has a high adoption rate and low euthanasia rate?”  “Do you want to see more animals euthanized or killed by picketing the shelter and discouraging adopting families from coming to this facility to adopt a new pet companion?”  “Why target a facility that is out performing the national average and is adopting more animals than the majority of shelters in San Bernardino County?”


Let them try to explain to the reporters why they are after Devore when there so many more deserving shelters for their attention. They have yet to answer the challenge for that answer.



Jurisdiction
San Bernardino County
Apple Valley
Barstow
Hesperia
Needles
Rancho Cucamonga
Total Animals Received
16,177
5,631
3,250
8,164
572
5,012
Animals Adopted
7,538
1,612
1,120
1,744
102
3,746
Animals Adopted (%)
46.60%
28.63%
34.46%
21.36%
17.83%
74.74%
Animals Returned to Owner
971
598
102
730
53
624
Animals Transferred
126
0
16
58
0
7
TOTAL - Adoption, RTO & Trans %
53.38%
39.25%
38.09%
31.01%
27.10%
87.33%
Euthanized Total
7,304
3,089
1,535
5,656
358
631
Euthanized Total (%)
45.15%
54.86%
47.23%
69.28%
62.59%
12.59%







Jurisdiction
Redlands
San Bernardino City
29 Palms
Upland
Victorville
Yucca Valley
Total Animals Received
2,656
17,934
2,094
2,906
3,764
2,226
Animals Adopted
1,350
3,475
476
1,780
663
452
Animals Adopted (%)
50.83%
19.38%
22.73%
61.25%
17.61%
20.31%
Animals Returned to Owner
355
884
403
420
170
257
Animals Transferred
33
32
0
119
0
10
TOTAL - Adoption, RTO & Trans %
65.44%
24.48%
41.98%
79.80%
22.13%
32.30%
Euthanized Total
1,031
13,369
1,382
456
3,835
1,469
Euthanized Total (%)
38.82%
74.55%
66.00%
15.69%
101.89%
65.99%
Animal Admission and Disposition Data Compiled from Calendar Year 2011 Local Reports of Rabies Control Activities