I think we have all heard the outrageous lie by the activists of the frostbite at Devore. Well, they were challenged to present proof of this frostbite and they have yet to answer that challenged.
Now they are claiming it was a chemical burn. Wait a minute here. Did no one take this dog to the vet? Were there no tests run to determine the prognosis of either frostbite or chemical burns? What's the deal here?