It makes me wonder what happened tothose 1400 pets taken during the Rachael Ray $100,000 challenge by adoption groups, adoption groups that failed to submit paperwork so Devore would get credit.
Schemes and scams are cropping up every week, it seems, all based in the philosophy of No Kill. Shelters being forced to give pets to groups when it is not in the best interest of the pet. These adoption groups lying, making up sob stories and all the while asking for money. Even going so far as to ask for money when the pet is still sitting in the shelter.
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/society/animal-rights/practice-flipping-pets-unacceptable-and-wrong
No Kill promotes free give away of pets from shelters, better than them dying No Kill says. In the same breath, No Kill says don't give your pets away for free especially on Craigslist. Now this seems a little hypocritical to me. These adoption groups pay a small adoption fee to Devore and get a spay/neutered pet, they have no money invested but they get a hefty adoption fee. No Kill shelters are giving away pets, pets that cost taxpayer dollars, and people are taking advantage of it to make money.
Read this article, you will once again be surprised by what is happening all because of the No Kill movement/philosophy.
Devore should not be subject to the current wave of accusations. This blog is dedicated to those who seek the truth and report the truth about Devore. Comments in the form of accusations will not be published. Comments are moderated.
Monday, November 19, 2012
INTERESTING ARTICLE ABOUT "FLIPPING", MAKES YOU WONDER
Labels:
Brian Cronin,
David Wert,
James Ramos,
Supervisor Brad Mitzelfelt,
Supervisor Gary Ovitt,
Supervisor Janice Rutherford,
Supervisor Josie Gonzales,
Supervisor Neil Derry
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Unfortunately not all pets can be “fixed” like a house that someone would “fix-up or flip.” Some animals with extreme behavioral problems cannot be fixed simply by transporting them to another facility or rescue group. You have to wonder who would adopt an aggressive dog that has mauled someone. Why would anyone want to put someone in harm’s way by encouraging impulse adoptions or misleading a new adoptive family?
ReplyDeleteYou have to understand no kill is driven by saving the animal at all costs. They do not care about risk to the community or innocent adoptors. They always have an excuse for any animal that has bad behavior even in extreme circumstances. However to keep adoptions up they simply do not tell any one about it and hope it will go away.
ReplyDeleteYou have to understand no kill is driven by saving the animal at all costs. They do not care about risk to the community or innocent adoptors. They always have an excuse for any animal that has bad behavior even in extreme circumstances. However to keep adoptions up they simply do not tell any one about it and hope it will go away.
ReplyDelete